| Message |
Sure, PNG support isn't unanimous across all browsers, there are some issues with the alpha channel. Sure, if you resize an image via HTML, different browsers anti-alias differently. For a normal JPEG rendered in IE and in Firefox, it's going to look exactly the same. If there were any difference it would be because of an in-HTML resize of the image, in which case the anti-aliasing could look bad - either way the colors would not be different. Yes, there are color management plugins for different browsers, but this is the exception, not the rule and clearly does not apply to this situation as anyone using this plugin would know that it affects the image rendering and would say so. I've looked at your poorly post-processed, over-saturated sig picture in IE 6, IE 7, FF 2.0 and 3.0 and of course it's exactly the same. Yes, color profiles exist for safari, etc. Assuming you used a standard color profile, sRGB, it's going to render the same in all browsers. Your post-processing sucks, and your monitor needs calibration.
Recursively Yours, Kenny... PETZ Member #5
 You guys rock socks. (Click for pie-chart)
Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. - EW Dijkstra
|
 |